<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Like the Silverlight 2.0 Control Templating Model (better than WPF&#8217;s)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notstatic.com/archives/112/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flatlander</title>
		<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Flatlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notstatic.com/archives/141#comment-337</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why the Silverlight VisualStateManager is wrong...&lt;/strong&gt;

Silverlight has a control templating system similar to that of Windows Presentation Foundation. However, Silverlight and WPF take different approaches to updating the user interface as the user interacts with it. WPF uses triggers: the creator of a tem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why the Silverlight VisualStateManager is wrong&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Silverlight has a control templating system similar to that of Windows Presentation Foundation. However, Silverlight and WPF take different approaches to updating the user interface as the user interacts with it. WPF uses triggers: the creator of a tem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notstatic.com</title>
		<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>notstatic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notstatic.com/archives/141#comment-298</guid>
		<description>[...] took some flack for my (arguably polemic) thoughts on the Silverlight control templating model so I was happy to see the second to last paragraph of this post where John shares some of my views [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] took some flack for my (arguably polemic) thoughts on the Silverlight control templating model so I was happy to see the second to last paragraph of this post where John shares some of my views [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlon Grech</title>
		<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlon Grech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notstatic.com/archives/141#comment-265</guid>
		<description>I love you blog but Sorry, I cannot agree with you on this one. By choosing this model SL will break the Developer + Designer workflow. The designer will be too dependent on the Developer and the Developer will have to swear and change the controls just because the Designer decided to change something... lookless controls were a tried and tested SUCCESS. Why do we want to change that in SL and try to re invent something else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you blog but Sorry, I cannot agree with you on this one. By choosing this model SL will break the Developer + Designer workflow. The designer will be too dependent on the Developer and the Developer will have to swear and change the controls just because the Designer decided to change something&#8230; lookless controls were a tried and tested SUCCESS. Why do we want to change that in SL and try to re invent something else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I don&#8217;t like the Silverlight 2.0 Control Templating Model (a flip side to Robby&#8217;s comparison between WPF and Silverlight model.) :: designerslove.net</title>
		<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>I don&#8217;t like the Silverlight 2.0 Control Templating Model (a flip side to Robby&#8217;s comparison between WPF and Silverlight model.) :: designerslove.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notstatic.com/archives/141#comment-266</guid>
		<description>[...] Just read Robby&#8217;s excellent post about silverlight templating model. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Just read Robby&#8217;s excellent post about silverlight templating model. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Control Templates - Silverlight 2.0 vs WPF - theWPFintegrator</title>
		<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Control Templates - Silverlight 2.0 vs WPF - theWPFintegrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notstatic.com/archives/141#comment-268</guid>
		<description>[...] just read a great post by Robby on why he likes the control template model in Silverlight 2.0 better than the one in WPF. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] just read a great post by Robby on why he likes the control template model in Silverlight 2.0 better than the one in WPF. I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Morrill</title>
		<link>http://notstatic.com/archives/112#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Morrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notstatic.com/archives/141#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Wow the first positive remark I've read about SL control templating.  I have not developed an opinion on it just yet, but I think Dr. WPF and yourself have conflicting perspectives on the subject.

So...Both as gentlemen of honor, I suggest you two have a duel.  I believe it worked out well for Alexander Hamilton.  ;)

-Jer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow the first positive remark I&#8217;ve read about SL control templating.  I have not developed an opinion on it just yet, but I think Dr. WPF and yourself have conflicting perspectives on the subject.</p>
<p>So&#8230;Both as gentlemen of honor, I suggest you two have a duel.  I believe it worked out well for Alexander Hamilton.  <img src='http://notstatic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
-Jer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
