Apple Design Awards
Check out the best in OSX software design for 2007 here. As WPF developers, we’re fond of pointing out that all Mac software kind of seems the same, that Apple keeps you in a box. Where’s the creativity? I guess there is some truth to the fact that OSX has a very strong design “built-in” and it can be hard to break out, but these are creative apps! I especially like Coda–it definitely pushes against the walls of that box. The others may not be quite so playful and, in fact, may kind of look like other software on the Mac, but here’s the thing: they’re great apps and, in fact, people generally seem to appreciate the fact that they look like the other software on the Mac.
Don’t get me wrong. There’s a case to be made for the flexibility that WPF gives you and we’ve seen some amazing UI work in WPF, both visual and interactive. I wouldn’t trade it. I can only imagine how much work it was to get sticky tape and 3D previews in the Coda previewer, and that’s not much more than a day’s work in WPF. On the other hand, most of us are still investing a lot of time reinventing the look of an app because, frankly, we still don’t want to look like Windows. Aero is great, but it’s still left most of us opting out, not in.
Maybe it comes back to loving your software. Mac people love the whole package and that includes the operating system. So, to look like the OS is too be part of that thing that users love. On the other hand, most of us still see Windows as something we just use. So to look like Windows is to look kind of boring. I honestly hope that Microsoft can change that. In the meantime, though, since Windows users are keeping things “professional” with their OS we’ll need to create the love ourselves and WPF is great for that.
June 14th, 2007 at 10:18 pm
I think you miss the point a little bit. It probably wouldn’t be hard to implement the sticky tape and 3d previews, and you could probably throw something together like it in a short amount of time. (So could I.) The thing that sets Coda apart is that they did it _beautifully_, and that takes time and taste.
I hear this a lot from windows fans/developers: “Oh, I could do that”. Yeah you could, but you probably wouldn’t spend the time on the tiny details that it takes to make it completely awesome, like developers like Panic do. That’s why Windows apps rarely generate the sort of buzz and passion that Mac apps do.
June 20th, 2007 at 1:52 pm
i hope to see some new themes like AERO
i know it’s not JUST a theme and it takes time to build such, but it’s the neccessity of market to showcase that Windows Vista has an appeal.
Take a MAC machine and compare the OS with Vista, we had to admit that OSX is much cool looking than Vista, but i also buy your point about
“. On the other hand, most of us still see Windows as something we just use. So to look like Windows is to look kind of boring. “
June 26th, 2007 at 1:46 am
I have a question, Roby- why don’t people smile more? I think it would be funner if people smiled more.
thx